Aspartame. The toxic sweetener.

With the world now gone health crazy all of a sudden we are now obsessed with reducing the amounts of "bad for you" ingredients like sugar.

Yes as it's completely normal to care about your health and well being we have to be careful about substitutes we are using instead of these ingredients. People are now still trying to have the same tasting products by using synthetically made alternatives that have not been publicly tested for any ill-effects from their use. 

The substitute manufactures are using instead of sugar is a synthetically made compound called aspartame. Aspartame from my reading is actually toxic to humans and was created as a brain neutraliser in lobotomies. 

Some other mainstream information shows aspartame as always being surrounded by controversy since its release for human consumption. 

The following is taken from Wikipedia. 

In 1996, the controversy reached a wider audience with a 60 Minutes report^[1] that discussed criticisms of the FDA approval process and concerns that aspartame could cause brain tumors in humans. The 60 Minutes special stated that "aspartame's approval was one of the most contested in FDA history."^[1]

Here's a link to the full article:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspartame_controversy

It's amazing to think that something so shrouded in controversy has been allowed to be mass marketed to the entire world. It's hard to find a drink now without this chemical added. Nobody apparently knows the true health issues of this chemical but what scientists will all tell is that they all know that it is definitely NOT good for you. They will also say that yes it's  bad for you but not officially classified. 

Also taken from the Wikipedia article is this:

 "The Cesare Maltoni Cancer Research Center of the European Ramazzini Foundation of Oncology and Environmental Sciences has released several studies which claim that aspartame can increase several malignancies in rodents, concluding that aspartame is a potential carcinogen at normal dietary doses."

The following article outlines that 6 former HHS employees were involved in aspartame approval. Now if that doesn't send alarm bells ringing I don't know what will. The HHS stands for Health and Human services. Doesn't look like their doing a great job when the let chemicals like that out in the open for the masses.

Here's another great article:

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/06/29/sweet-misery-documentary.aspx

A Detective Story of Corporate Fraud and Manipulation

"Sweet Misery includes many heartfelt conversations with aspartame victims, including one woman serving a prison sentence for poisoning her late husband, even though his health signs suggest aspartame may have been to blame.

You’ll also hear from medical experts, including Dr. Russell Blaylock, a renowned neurosurgeon, who explain why aspartame acts as a poison to your brain and body.

But perhaps the most riveting aspect of the film is the evidence showing the extensive corporate fraud and manipulation that lead to aspartame's approval. The film has archival footage from G.D. Searle, the producer of aspartame, and federal officials describing the extensive propaganda used to push aspartame on the market.

Additionally, dialogue from a former US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) investigator also detailing the manipulation that took place to get this chemical approved will leave you with the "big picture" of conspiracy and even criminal negligence surrounding this popular artificial sweetener. There’s even an exchange described with Donald Rumsfeld, who was the CEO of Searle and, at the same time, part of Reagan's transition team when the FDA's board of inquiry was overruled to allow the marketing of aspartame as a food additive. Prior to this time, aspartame was unanimously rejected by the FDA because the scientific data just did not support it as a safe product."

There's also a great video on that website article too. It's on for 90 mins and gets into a lot of details.

Think it's time to get out the real sugar products but just cut down on it. Think about it thoroughly before you buy any products with chemical  substitutes. Think what the possible ill-effects could be. Has it been fully tested and approved by numerous bodies. How long is it on the market, if it's a relatively new product maybe you should refrain from it as even if products have been vigorously tested it can still harm in the long term. Should you be putting chemicals in your body which were made in a lab? Would it be better to stick to natural ingredients? 

Think about it before you consume or let your children consume products that are more than likely going to do serious harm to you in the long term. Don't have that attitude; "sure if its in the shops it must be safe." It's the wrong way to think. Supermarkets want to make money so they will sell the "in thing" at the time. People working in testing labs, when offered a return will gladly approve a product provided they are shielded from any possible future allegations of corruption. 

Here's a really good article on aspartame and how it became mainstream. You can see the power people behind getting it approved. Donald Rumsfeld, Monsanto among other parties have helped this dangerous chemical become one of the most potentially dangerous chemicals around which is allowed onto nearly every shelf around the world.

http://rense.com/general33/legal.htm

So the patent for aspartame was from Donald rumsfelds company at the time GD searle. Then Monsanto bought this company. Monsanto, is that not the company who has a monopoly over nearly every genetically modified piece of corn on the planet? Are Monsanto not the company to blame for Agent Orange? Are Monsanto not the company who recently lobbied and received a court order called the Monsanto protection act. This act stops anybody being able to sue them now or in the future for any possible ill-effects from the consumption of their products. See an article on this here: 

http://www.ibtimes.com/monsanto-protection-act-5-terrifying-things-know-about-hr-933-provision-1156079

Well I know ill be reading every label I can now to avoid anything git to do with aspartame. Its poison. Stick to natural foods but just cut back on the natural food that you know is not healthy. Put your middle finger up to these corporations and stop buying their poisons.

Remember natural is best. 

No license required for owning a horse in Ireland

No license required for owning a horse in Ireland

What on earth are the lawmakers in Ireland thinking? You need a license to own a TV, a Dog license, a car, motorbike, vehicle licenses but you don't need a license to own a horse in Ireland. This is an absolute disgrace. We have underprivileged areas in Ireland littered with horses. In most cases these horses are malnourished, badly treated and emaciated.

It does not make an ounce of sense for a 15 year old boy going to Smithfield in Dublin and purchasing any horse they have the money for. No real legislation involved at all. Most of these horses end up being left tied up, hungry, emaciated and left living a horrible life. People, including lawmakers should finally put an end to this un-managed area of society. They say that you need a license to have a horse in a controlled area. But are all those areas of the side of the road beside halting sites "controlled areas" and do these people have licenses for the horses. I see horses on the side of roads all the time, surely the police see the same animals and don't seem to be taking the animals away from the people who leave them there.

The argument

The argument the other side is that its part of Irish peoples heritage is to have the right to own a horse. Yes, that's OK in a civilization that doesn't have cars. We have to move with the times. Its not right to keep a horse in conditions like the above. Its time to change the laws to be modern in line with everything else.

What should happen now:

Completely overhaul the situation. Enforce licensing. Every horse must have a minimum area of open grassland to stay in. Access to food and water 24 hours. Access to a stable. Proper horse experts should have a roll in ruling the requirements for "owning" a horse. All horses kept in conditions other than aid out in the licensing should automatically be taken into the care of people who can actually look after them.

Increase sentencing for hard criminals

Increase Sentencing for certain crimes. It makes sense. Common Sense. 

For too long now we have been hearing of crimes that seem to go practically unpunished when the perpetrators are found guilty. Rape, Murder, Assault, Theft charges all seem to be getting lesser and lesser penalties. Where other crime like not paying back a mortgage or white collar crime perpetrators get the book thrown at them. Why is this? I think the answer is simple, its because the people committing the white collar crime are hitting the very wealthy more than the murderers and the rapists. The people who make the laws don't have to face the public like normal people. They only get to read about them in the news or radio. They don't go to normal pubs, clubs or even hospitals or schools. So standard person to person crime doesn't really effect them.

When a white collar criminal is caught, they get the book thrown at them because they are more then likely affecting the pockets of the people who are in the higher tiers of society. Like bankers, if someone rips off a bank, the banks shareholders get annoyed. And, who are the banks shareholders? It other bankers, politicians, doctors, lawyers, solicitors, and other upper class people. One of the people i mentioned are politicians. These guys can, and are changing laws to make white collar crime even more punishable. While the murderers and the rapists are getting a little slap on the wrist. Vested interests are to blame. Most humans by nature will look after themselves first and foremost. Unfortunately we live in a society where most of these types of humans are in some of the top positions in society who make the laws, deal out the penalties, control government, etc.

 

The only solution to this is common sense. Society is being destroyed by the gap between the middle  class and the upper class getting bigger and bigger. So much so that soon the gap will be too large to claw back. A new system is needed. The current system is broke, and the justice system is only a small part of the overall broken picture. Nearly every section of society is broke due to the same reasons, vested interests.


Common Sense Rules.

WIFI - Harmful to your health - May cause cancer

WIFI - Harmful to your health - May cause cancer

What could be wrong with WIFI?/ Common sense people!!!

I was always wondering if all them invisible electric currents could have some ill-effects to the human body. My take on it is that it has to have effects on the body. think about it, we are connecting to the internet through the air. so we have electricity and radiation all throughout our homes, schools hospital and out there in the open. It doesnt take a rocket scientist to understand the effects this can have on the human body.

Now im not an expert on this field but like a lot of other people i have common sense. Here's my take on it.

WiFi is the standard for receiving wireless connectivity. A WiFi signal is a powerful, invisible energy that circulates a building, or an area and enables computers and devices to connect into it to gain access to the internet or trnsfer files from device to device. Now in an age where WiFi, Bluetooth, Mobile Phones, 3G, 4G is gaining momentum too quickly in my eyes its time to start looking into the possible ill effects of WiFi and wireless connections in general.

We now have too much wireless connectivity going on without any real research into the possible ill effects of it all. As i said im no expert but ill give you my take on it all.

WiFi connection hubs are normally connected to the internet through wires, whether its from your telephone box or by your satellite dish connecting into it using wires, in my case i have a standard telephone connected to an ethernet, then the ethernet connected my a wireless router. Although i hve since removed the wireless router and connect now straight into the ethernet.

So depending on the strength of the connection energy is continuously given out in a given area so people can connect into it. What issues can this have on the human body? Well, common sense would tell you that if you were to sit beside a strong WiFi current for a long time daily it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that your body would see signs of problems.

Imagine, this wireless energy is powerful enough to download huge files through thin air in the matter of minutes. if your body gets in the way of this it manages to cut right through your body just to get to that other device. the more powerful the connection the more chance of it doing more damage. Your body is a bunch of cells, nerve endings and electricity. These radio frequency signals can adversely damage the way your body works. It doesn't nothing but effect your bodies natural rhythm. The more powerful the signal the worse damage its going to do.

I was actually shocked lately to hear that the WHO (World Health Organization) recently came out and said that there could be a link with WiFi and cancer. http://www.torontosun.com/2011/06/28/health-canada-claims-wi-fi-is-safe-despite-warning

Thats not the only ariticle on the link all you have to do it  quick search and lots, and lots of articles show even more links with WiFi and cancer. Actally, the article above is an example of stupidity. The WHO say that theres a link. Then the Canadian National public health department says they wont stop rolling out WiFi as there is still no actual proof lining them together. Come on Canada, if theres any doubt whatsoever then you should stop it immediately. If the World Health Organisation say something, then its time to stop rolling out until nmerous long term testing is done to the possible issues.

As i already said, i think there is a definite link to health problems in the continued use and upgrading of wireless technologies. So its time to stop increasing speeds, stop  bringing out new technologies and do some real testing.

This is going to be another example of "oh, well maybe we should have done some testing on this", we all know about products which have been launched in the past, without proper testing that have caused devastating effects on humans. Its time to stop being used as test guinea pigs.

http://www.safeinschool.org/2011/06/world-health-organization-labels.html

Ill eave yo with the following taken from the British Telegraph:

"The World Health Organisation, which has examined the topic in depth, says: ""In the area of biological effects and medical applications of non-ionizing radiation approximately 25,000 articles have been published over the past 30 years. Despite the feeling of some people that more research needs to be done, scientific knowledge in this area is now more extensive than for most chemicals. Based on a recent in-depth review of the scientific literature, the WHO concluded that current evidence does not confirm the existence of any health consequences from exposure to low-level electromagnetic fields. However, some gaps in knowledge about biological effects exist and need further research.""

The main gap appears to be the potential impact on children using mobile phones for more than 10 years. (Children are more susceptible to radiation than adults, and problems may take decades to appear.)"

Have Common Sense People.

Animal Cruelty

Animal Cruelty

My 1st blog will be about something that means a lot to me. Animal Cruelty, why is this such a common practice? I lay out some of the reasons this occurs below:

Cowardly People: I have witnessed some cowards in my time taking out vengeance on poor defenceless animals. This is the lowest of the low. Just because these idiots cant handle themselves in a fight with another human being they feel they will take it out on something that will not fight back. Total losers these guys are, a shame to humanity.

Cristmas cruelty: Idiots that buy an animal just for Christmas are losers. They will inevitably get rid of the animal as soon as it gets a little older than a baby. People should have to apply for a license to be allowed hold a pet, no matter what the animal is.

Halloween: This is a terrible time of the year for animals especially if bonfires occur in your country, such as Ireland or the UK. Everyone knows this and anyone with pets should NOT let their pets out over the Halloween period AT ALL. All you need to do is ask your local VET this and they will tell you the same thing.

VETs: Another rediculous reason for animal cuelty are VETs recommending pets ot be put down. Soetimes this is for the most rediculous of reaons. "Im afraid to tell you that your pet needs to be put down, its for the best", whats the reason? "Hes got a very sore tummy"
Come on VETs give me a break, putting an animal down is a handy €75. A failed operation will cost €200 but might take up a lot more of your time. Think of the animals for goodness sake. I personally had a dog, had an issue with eating for around 4 days, we brought it to the vet and they recommended putting it down as it had a kidney disease. We asked for alternatives so the VET said he could prescribe meds and might help our dog live longer. It ebded up living for another great 2 years.

It would be great if governments could help by outloawing ownership of any pet until proper grooming has been done to the potential owners, then licenses given. A license should carry a chage per year. If whoever wants a pet should be willing to pay a charge per year for the privilages it brings with it.

Immediate termination of a license and a fine of minimum €2000 for anyone in breach of the terms of their license.

Immediate confiscation of all animals in their posession.

For anyone thinking of breeding animals there should be strict guidelines and the keeping of the animals should be randomly checked without notice. A large fee for holding breeders license will be required also. Terminations of license should be immediate for any mis-handling of the animals or their surroundings.


We need to get the word out their that animal cruelty cannot and will not be tolerated. And save those stupid excuses for the neanderthal times such as, "but bull fighting is a tradition in parts of Spain"... well Slavery was a tradition for hundreds of years and now thats abolished.

Please join my blog and start a revolution, a revolution of total Common Sense. Its needed now more than ever.

Common Sense Party Strikes again.