No license required for owning a horse in Ireland

No license required for owning a horse in Ireland

What on earth are the lawmakers in Ireland thinking? You need a license to own a TV, a Dog license, a car, motorbike, vehicle licenses but you don't need a license to own a horse in Ireland. This is an absolute disgrace. We have underprivileged areas in Ireland littered with horses. In most cases these horses are malnourished, badly treated and emaciated.

It does not make an ounce of sense for a 15 year old boy going to Smithfield in Dublin and purchasing any horse they have the money for. No real legislation involved at all. Most of these horses end up being left tied up, hungry, emaciated and left living a horrible life. People, including lawmakers should finally put an end to this un-managed area of society. They say that you need a license to have a horse in a controlled area. But are all those areas of the side of the road beside halting sites "controlled areas" and do these people have licenses for the horses. I see horses on the side of roads all the time, surely the police see the same animals and don't seem to be taking the animals away from the people who leave them there.

The argument

The argument the other side is that its part of Irish peoples heritage is to have the right to own a horse. Yes, that's OK in a civilization that doesn't have cars. We have to move with the times. Its not right to keep a horse in conditions like the above. Its time to change the laws to be modern in line with everything else.

What should happen now:

Completely overhaul the situation. Enforce licensing. Every horse must have a minimum area of open grassland to stay in. Access to food and water 24 hours. Access to a stable. Proper horse experts should have a roll in ruling the requirements for "owning" a horse. All horses kept in conditions other than aid out in the licensing should automatically be taken into the care of people who can actually look after them.

Increase sentencing for hard criminals

Increase Sentencing for certain crimes. It makes sense. Common Sense. 

For too long now we have been hearing of crimes that seem to go practically unpunished when the perpetrators are found guilty. Rape, Murder, Assault, Theft charges all seem to be getting lesser and lesser penalties. Where other crime like not paying back a mortgage or white collar crime perpetrators get the book thrown at them. Why is this? I think the answer is simple, its because the people committing the white collar crime are hitting the very wealthy more than the murderers and the rapists. The people who make the laws don't have to face the public like normal people. They only get to read about them in the news or radio. They don't go to normal pubs, clubs or even hospitals or schools. So standard person to person crime doesn't really effect them.

When a white collar criminal is caught, they get the book thrown at them because they are more then likely affecting the pockets of the people who are in the higher tiers of society. Like bankers, if someone rips off a bank, the banks shareholders get annoyed. And, who are the banks shareholders? It other bankers, politicians, doctors, lawyers, solicitors, and other upper class people. One of the people i mentioned are politicians. These guys can, and are changing laws to make white collar crime even more punishable. While the murderers and the rapists are getting a little slap on the wrist. Vested interests are to blame. Most humans by nature will look after themselves first and foremost. Unfortunately we live in a society where most of these types of humans are in some of the top positions in society who make the laws, deal out the penalties, control government, etc.

 

The only solution to this is common sense. Society is being destroyed by the gap between the middle  class and the upper class getting bigger and bigger. So much so that soon the gap will be too large to claw back. A new system is needed. The current system is broke, and the justice system is only a small part of the overall broken picture. Nearly every section of society is broke due to the same reasons, vested interests.


Common Sense Rules.

WIFI - Harmful to your health - May cause cancer

WIFI - Harmful to your health - May cause cancer

What could be wrong with WIFI?/ Common sense people!!!

I was always wondering if all them invisible electric currents could have some ill-effects to the human body. My take on it is that it has to have effects on the body. think about it, we are connecting to the internet through the air. so we have electricity and radiation all throughout our homes, schools hospital and out there in the open. It doesnt take a rocket scientist to understand the effects this can have on the human body.

Now im not an expert on this field but like a lot of other people i have common sense. Here's my take on it.

WiFi is the standard for receiving wireless connectivity. A WiFi signal is a powerful, invisible energy that circulates a building, or an area and enables computers and devices to connect into it to gain access to the internet or trnsfer files from device to device. Now in an age where WiFi, Bluetooth, Mobile Phones, 3G, 4G is gaining momentum too quickly in my eyes its time to start looking into the possible ill effects of WiFi and wireless connections in general.

We now have too much wireless connectivity going on without any real research into the possible ill effects of it all. As i said im no expert but ill give you my take on it all.

WiFi connection hubs are normally connected to the internet through wires, whether its from your telephone box or by your satellite dish connecting into it using wires, in my case i have a standard telephone connected to an ethernet, then the ethernet connected my a wireless router. Although i hve since removed the wireless router and connect now straight into the ethernet.

So depending on the strength of the connection energy is continuously given out in a given area so people can connect into it. What issues can this have on the human body? Well, common sense would tell you that if you were to sit beside a strong WiFi current for a long time daily it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that your body would see signs of problems.

Imagine, this wireless energy is powerful enough to download huge files through thin air in the matter of minutes. if your body gets in the way of this it manages to cut right through your body just to get to that other device. the more powerful the connection the more chance of it doing more damage. Your body is a bunch of cells, nerve endings and electricity. These radio frequency signals can adversely damage the way your body works. It doesn't nothing but effect your bodies natural rhythm. The more powerful the signal the worse damage its going to do.

I was actually shocked lately to hear that the WHO (World Health Organization) recently came out and said that there could be a link with WiFi and cancer. http://www.torontosun.com/2011/06/28/health-canada-claims-wi-fi-is-safe-despite-warning

Thats not the only ariticle on the link all you have to do it  quick search and lots, and lots of articles show even more links with WiFi and cancer. Actally, the article above is an example of stupidity. The WHO say that theres a link. Then the Canadian National public health department says they wont stop rolling out WiFi as there is still no actual proof lining them together. Come on Canada, if theres any doubt whatsoever then you should stop it immediately. If the World Health Organisation say something, then its time to stop rolling out until nmerous long term testing is done to the possible issues.

As i already said, i think there is a definite link to health problems in the continued use and upgrading of wireless technologies. So its time to stop increasing speeds, stop  bringing out new technologies and do some real testing.

This is going to be another example of "oh, well maybe we should have done some testing on this", we all know about products which have been launched in the past, without proper testing that have caused devastating effects on humans. Its time to stop being used as test guinea pigs.

http://www.safeinschool.org/2011/06/world-health-organization-labels.html

Ill eave yo with the following taken from the British Telegraph:

"The World Health Organisation, which has examined the topic in depth, says: ""In the area of biological effects and medical applications of non-ionizing radiation approximately 25,000 articles have been published over the past 30 years. Despite the feeling of some people that more research needs to be done, scientific knowledge in this area is now more extensive than for most chemicals. Based on a recent in-depth review of the scientific literature, the WHO concluded that current evidence does not confirm the existence of any health consequences from exposure to low-level electromagnetic fields. However, some gaps in knowledge about biological effects exist and need further research.""

The main gap appears to be the potential impact on children using mobile phones for more than 10 years. (Children are more susceptible to radiation than adults, and problems may take decades to appear.)"

Have Common Sense People.